Observations from the unpaid twitter intern. 1) No builder of TC was seen celebrating flows from alleged illicit actors.
03 Oct 2023, 07:07
Observations from the unpaid twitter intern.
1) No builder of TC was seen celebrating flows from alleged illicit actors
2) In the last 3mo, TC has processed $1.6bn in swaps; thus alleged illicit flows <3% in the same period
3) ETH>BTC is not even a top route
Same news in other sources
3THORChainRUNE #56
03 Oct 2023, 07:07
TC has a public cross-chain transactional graph; the reason why flows from illicit actors are easy to track is precisely because of this.
Decentralised cross-chain swaps are here. The industry should get behind the TC community and handle it, not levy the blame on them.
TC has a public cross-chain transactional graph.
TC has a public cross-chain transactional graph; the reason why flows from illicit actors are easy to track is precisely because of this.
Decentralised cross-chain swaps are here. The industry should get behind the TC community and handle it, not levy the blame on them.
THORChainRUNE #56
03 Oct 2023, 07:07
If TC becomes captured, oppressed, lobotomised or neutered, it has failed on its quest to become a neutral and amoral base-layer protocol - which is a perfectly reasonable function.
TC provides a net good, else nobody would use it.
Onwards.
If TC becomes captured, oppressed, lobotomised or neutered, it has failed on its quest to become a neutral and amoral base-layer
If TC becomes captured, oppressed, lobotomised or neutered, it has failed on its quest to become a neutral and amoral base-layer protocol - which is a perfectly reasonable function.
TC provides a net good, else nobody would use it.
Onwards.
THORChainRUNE #56
03 Oct 2023, 07:07
Limiting tx sizes, blocking addresses, adding registration - are all completely ineffective when dealing with a well-resourced illicit actor:
- will split tx's
- will rinse addresses
- will buy identities
Limiting tx sizes, blocking addresses, adding registration - are all completely ineffective when dealing with a well-resourced i
Limiting tx sizes, blocking addresses, adding registration - are all completely ineffective when dealing with a well-resourced illicit actor:
- will split tx's
- will rinse addresses
- will buy identities